Home » OL Weekly

Book Review: Franz Kafka, The Poet of Shame and Guilt

By (July 19, 2013) 8 Comments

Kafka: The Poet of Shame and Guiltkafka

By Saul Friedlander

Yale University Press, 2013


Revered historian Saul Friedlander is at first blush an unlikely candidate to further Yale University Press’ “Jewish Lives” series; his brilliant volume The Years of Extermination: Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1939-1945 won the Pulitzer Prize, and as he himself points out in Kafka: The Poet of Shame and Guilt, biography is not his trade.

Likewise Kafka himself might seem an unlikely candidate for the series. He was born in 1883 into a German-speaking and thoroughly assimilated Jewish middle class family in Prague, then the jewel of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. From an early age and for most of his life, he was very pointedly agnostic on the subject of God and indifferent on the subject of his own Jewishness. Certainly in his day-to-day life and (despite some rather unconvincing academic saber-rattling to the contrary) in his work, he was in no way an exemplar of that admittedly problematic concept, the“Jewish life.”

There’s no resolution to the shoe-horning of Kafka into the series, but Friedlander’s own presence is surprisingly easy to figure out: for a start, there’s a good deal of cultural affinity. Like Kafka, Friedlander comes from a solidly middle class family of Prague Jews. Like Kafka, Friedlander’s father attended the German Law School of Charles University (fifteen years later than Kafka) and got a job as legal advisor to an insurance company, as Kafka did. Friedlander’s parents died in Nazi concentration camps, and so did Kafka’s three sisters.

Of course there’s a deeper affinity than mere biography: Kafka’s writing, which clearly slips past Friedlander’s – and everybody else’s – reading defenses. Franz Kafka was intelligent but unfocused, handsome but deeply insecure, talented but often incredibly lazy; passionate but almost incapable of intellectual, personal, or romantic commitment; in virtually every conceivable way, he is the living avatar of the postmodern literary figure; little wonder, then, that his bored, panicky lack of focus should strike a chord with the postmodern Nintendo era. His fiction is gorgeous, his ideas are subversive, and his dreams were outsized; the more books are written about him, the more he looks like the ultimate poet of a dark and formidably unbalanced century. Like many of his readers, Friedlander has been reading and re-reading Kafka for years, and that, too, can be a natural motive for writing a brief book on the man and his work.

Friedlander studies the themes of that work through Kafka’s trove of letters, famous short stories, and through such books as The Trial, The Castle, and Amerika. He relates the familiar outlines of Kafka’s life: the feverish but tangled literary activity, the incessant letter-writing, the sexual affairs and prolonged relationships, especially Felice Bauer, whom he met through his close friend Max Brod and with whose affections he trifled for the rest of his life. Some of Friedlander’s handling of this well-known material occasionally verges on the student’s trot, although the lamp-bright insight into human nature that makes his Holocaust studies imperishable certainly doesn’t desert him here.

And if you’re talking about Franz Kafka’s human nature, you must inevitably talk about Max Brod, his lifelong friend and literary champion, the man who saved most of Kafka’s extant work from Kafka’s own self-indulgent destruction. The fact that Brod also shaped and edited his friend’s posthumous reputation becomes crucial in Friedlander’s short book, because the white-hot coal burning at the center of The Poet of Shame and Guilt involves a Kafka who must be extracted from Brod’s careful presentations and allowed to stand on his own; a Kafka Brod attempted to curate and edit out of existence; a Kafka who was sexually attracted to men as well as (or far more so than) women.

It’s not a new interpretation (given how much has been written about Kakfa, new interpretations will be correspondingly tough to come by), but Friedlander presents it deftly and thoroughly, sifting through what little material is left in order to present his case. He writes, for example, of Kafka’s fascination with the Prague novelist Franz Werfel:

“Today in the coffee-house with Werfel,” Kafka wrote in April 1914. “How he looked from the distance, seated at the coffee table. Stooped, half reclining even in the wooden chair, the beautiful profile of his face pressed against his chest … His dangling glasses make it easier to trace the delicate outlines of his face.”

That the fascination was not temporary is easily shown; that it had fundamental erotic undertones Friedlander works to show as well, adroitly correcting neutered German while he’s at it:

Later again, in mid-November 1917, Kafka wrote to Brod about a dream, the ambiguity of which he himself commented on: “If I go on to say that in a recent dream I gave Werfel a kiss, I stumble right into the middle of Bluher’s book. But more of that later. The book upset me [es hat mich aufgeregt, “the book excited me”]; I had to put it aside for two days …” Bluher, a leading figure in the German youth movement, wrote about male erotic bonding in his 1917 work The Role of Eroticism in Male Society.

Long before these confessions, Friedlander notes, Kafka was writing in his diary about posing for an artist in the nude at age 19 as a model for St. Sebastian. The picture of Kafka the serial womanizer stripping off his clothes in a Prague studio in 1912 and allowing another man to tie him to a post and paste fake arrows on his chest is slightly jarring even in the 21st century (actual pictures would be yet more jarring still – do they exist? If they ever surface, will we claim we were unprepared?). Friedlander shows that he knows this by presenting it all with becoming gravity, and he has a deeper purpose in doing so at all: his contention is that deep sexual ambiguities and doubt form yet another instructive layer in the complex literary gift prudish Brod bequeathed to readers everywhere.

“It is highly improbable that Kafka ever considered the possibility of homosexual relations,” Friedlander writes, although by that point in his book he’s made a strong enough case to make the highly improbable seem possible. His book may not be embraced by Kafka traditionalists (it would have horrified the first of them, Brod himself), but it certainly makes for a thought-provoking hour’s reading, a hypothetical entry into a Yale “Gay Lives” series that doesn’t yet exist.




  • Leo Bulero says:

    I haven’t read the book, but from this review, it looks like the evidence for a homosexual Kafka is pretty scanty. What on earth is “gay” about that description of Werfel, for instance? Does noticing the attractiveness of a man automatically make one gay? And how does Friedlander deal with Kafka’s well-known heterosexual side, such as his frequent visits to prostitutes?

    More generally, haven’t many otherwise straight people had an occasional gay thought or experience? (And vice versa, for that matter.) Human sexuality is a continuum, not an on-off switch. So nothing surprising here, really.

    That said, I admit I’m judging only the review; maybe the book manages to integrate these things into something coherent.

  • Open Letters Monthly says:

    No, the book’s case isn’t any more coherent, just more detailed – but I tend to agree, Leo, about a Kinsey-style continuums. I’m fairly sure Friedlander’s point was that men who identify as vigorously heterosexual as Kafka (with his many fiancees and prostitutes) don’t tend to model naked in private for other men, or dream about kissing them, or be traumatized by books about homoeroticism. One of the themes of the book is that Kafka’s writing was seriously informed by his tortured awareness of this secret second self inside his own nature, and thinking about that certainly makes for an interesting re-reading of something like “The Hunger Artist” or “The Metamorphosis.”

  • Nell says:

    “Es hat mich aufgeregt” (“it upset me”) is closer to “it made me angry” or even “it made me nervous” than it is to “it excited me.” “Excited” would be “erregt.” Admittedly, “aufregend” means exciting, in the sense of excited (“aufgeregt”) children waiting in line for the exciting new amusement park ride. There is no “sexuelle Aufregung” the way there is “sexual excitement.” There is “sexuelle Erregung.” Where English has one word, German has two. The German was not “neutered.” The book that upset Kafka argues that repressed “inversion” powers the male bonding that sustains imperial Germany, and that this is a good thing. It upset just about everybody.

  • Leo Bulero says:

    “Kafka’s writing was seriously informed by his tortured awareness of this secret second self inside his own nature” – this is why I don’t trust psycho-biographies of long-dead people whom the author has never met. It builds mountains of speculation out of molehills of evidence. As far as Kafka studies are concerned, I’m more interested in checking out the latest volume of Reiner Stach’s big biography, which recently appeared in English.

    • Open Letters Monthly says:

      Those Stach volumes are immensely impressive, Leo – but I myself absolutely treasure the psych-speculations of intelligent historians and biographers, so I won’t be joining you in your abstention! I don’t trust such theorizing any more than you do, but it fascinates me just the same.

      • Leo Bulero says:

        OLM, we don’t disagree really. I often find such stuff entertaining, but it’s not what I normally look for in a biography: I want to get closer to the person who is the subject of the biography, not to the person who wrote it! And I suspect that’s what we have in most of these cases.

  • Max says:

    Poor Franz, he’s had it rough the last 10 years or so. The blatant disregard of his last wishes, lack of consideration, and now this. (Although, it’s sad that we still live in a society where mentioning that someone may be gay is considered an accusation.)

    Don’t buy this book.

1 Pingbacks »

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also Comments Feed via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.