Interview: Warm Bodies Co-stars Nicholas Hoult and Teresa Palmer

warm bodiesThe enjoyable zombie romance Warm Bodies might seem at first like some sort of unholy hybrid of the Twilight “I’m in Love with a Monster” teen fare and zombie-apocalypse pop-culture trends.

But in fact, as directed and adapted by Jonathan Levine (The Wackness, 50/50) from Isaac Marion’s yearning, existential 2011 novel, Warm Bodies feels more rooted in the sort of achingly bittersweet teen “outsider” films of the ’80s.

Plus, the new film’s high-concept Romeo and Juliet premise–an overly sensitive zombie boy known only as “R” falls for Julie, a pretty, apocalypse survivor –is nicely grounded by honest, likable performances by British actor Nicholas Hoult (About a Boy, A Single Man, X-Men: First Class, and next month’s Jack the Giant Slayer) and Australian actress Teresa Palmer (I Am Number Four, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, and the upcoming Terrence Malick film Knight of Cups). Warm Bodies also stars Analeigh Tipton, Rob Corddry, Dave Franco, and John Malkovich.

I sat down in Chicago a few weeks ago to chat with the with the equally charming Hoult and Palmer about Warm Bodies, the Zen of Zombies, and little chocolates made to look like pebbles.

Warm Bodies is currently playing in theaters everywhere. Read more »

My Top 25 Favorite Films of 2012

I’ll spare you my rambling thoughts about why I love/hate end-of-year (or even 13-days-after-the-end-of-the-year) lists, and I’ll spare you flowery prose about what a rich/poor/weak/strong/fascinating/frustrating/encouraging/discouraging/“insert-cinematic-trend-here” year 2012 was at the theater.

Instead, a few bookkeeping matters:

  • I draw a fuzzy, idiosyncratic distinction between a “great” film and a “favorite” film. In short, the former makes me think, makes me work at it, shows me something about life and humanity, and restores my belief in the power of cinema as an art form. A “favorite” film is one that may not do all if any of that, probably isn’t perfect, but that I know I’ll be watching again and again over the years. The best films fill both categories, but they are rare indeed. Don’t get all bunched up about it, but the list below contains some of both kinds.
  • No documentaries! I could tell you it’s because I feel non-fiction films operate on different criteria and serve different purposes in different ways than fictional ones do, but the simple fact is, as with every year, I never catch all the documentaries I want to by January. I’ve seen a lot of good ones, but there are still a half dozen docs that are getting high end-of-year marks from others that I really want to catch before I make a 2013 doc list. Look for it later this month. Or in February. Before June, for sure…
  • You’re going to see some glaring omissions–for example, a couple Oscar-nominated films that have been smothered in critical praise all year. Some of them I appreciated (Lincoln), others I loathed (Life of Pi), others I’m just not sure about yet and need to see again (Django Unchained). There will another list in a week called “Films I Liked Fine, but not Nearly as Much as Everyone Else.” Also, one of the only reasons I like doing an end-of-year list is to highlight less-seen, sometimes less-praised films I thought were great and deserve your attention. So while I liked it (with some major caveats), do you really need me to tell you Lincoln is worth seeing?
  • Where the hell are my full reviews of most of these films? Um… the dog ate them? I dropped them in the Hellmouth? No, for a number of reasons, I was horrible about writing reviews or film pieces last year. But I promise to turn that around—not only will I work to stay more up to date with the most interesting new films of 2013, but I’m going to do my best in the coming weeks to catch up with pieces about many of the films listed below, as well as most of the Oscar nominated titles. Pinky swear.
  • Rankings… don’t hold me to the details. After a couple weeks of fiddling around with this list while I re-watched a number of the films, the order below feels kinda sorta close to right-ish, but everything is flexible–other than the fact that number one is far and away, without a doubt my number one. Read more »

So, About Those Oscar Nominations…

20100828-owThe Oscars tend to twist us film critics and writers into pretzels of varying paradoxical silliness. There are film writers who truly love the Academy Awards and genuinely embrace them each late winter as a glamorous celebration of the art, craft, and business of (mostly) Hollywood movie magic.

There are just as many film critics who pay not one whit of attention to the Oscars, dismissing them as self-congratulatory PR fluff that turn what little artistic expression is left in the film industry into a horse race. And there are many who make their living reporting on, handicapping, and predicting the winners—for them, this is The Busy (Moneymaking) Season.

(And no, despite the wagging stupidity of mainstream entertainment “news,” there will be no “Nate Silver of the Oscars.” To suggest so for anything other than a cheap headline shows an utter misunderstanding of a) how the Academy Awards voting works, b) what Silver does, and c) numbers.)

beasts-of-the-southern-wild02But most of the rest of us are stuck somewhere in the lumpy middle. We know full well what the Oscars are, how they work, and why they really shouldn’t matter, and yet… We end up paying attention in part because love, hate, or ignore them, the Oscars are a big part of the mainstream movie year, a gaudy, gold-lamé-draped elephant in the room.

And we writers pay attention because—and here’s where I put my cynicism right out on the table—people, readers, Internet clickers are very interested in the Oscars. In addition to everyone’s general love of movie stars playing dress up, for most folks who don’t go to the movies every week or try to see the majority of new, major releases, the Oscars provide a “catch up list,” a cheat sheet: “here are the ‘good’ films you should have seen in 2012.” Read more »

Interview: The Impossible Director J.A. Bayona

impossibleDuring the holiday/awards season, most “prestige” films aim big–big messages, big emotions, big spectacle, big casts, and especially big running times.

Based on a true story, The Impossible centers on the devastating spectacle of the 2004 tsunami, specifically on how it caught up and separated a real Spanish family vacationing in Thailand. And in doing so, it plunges headlong into questions about life and death, and about suffering, survival, and hope.

But what’s truly impressive is that despite the watery weight of all that, the film–one of this season’s best–sticks closer to a nuanced and restrained (and often gritty, terrifying, and painfully realistic) naturalism that speaks to the strength and power of love and humanity without relying on easy emotional points or spoon-fed, feel-good Meaning. And does so in under two hours.

The Impossible stars Naomi Watts, Ewan McGregor, and stellar young newcomer Tom Holland as an Anglicized version of the real-life family. It’s directed by The Orphanage‘s Juan Antonio Bayona and written by his Orphanage screenwriter Sergio G. Sánchez based on a story from Maria Belon, whose family actually lived through the harrowing events.

originaldBack in October, I sat down with director J.A. Bayona during the Chicago International Film Festival to talk about The Impossible; about making a film that doesn’t exploit an actual disaster and finding that tricky balance between realism and artistic impact.

_____

Slight Spoiler Warning: The basic plot of The Impossible is that the family is split in half by the tsunami, both halves fearing the others are dead. The discussion below with Bayona doesn’t get specific, but it does touch on the film’s resolution, which is not a surprise if you know anything about the real family’s story or if you’ve seen any advertising for the film. Read more »

The Hobbit: An All-Too Expected Journey… or Been There and Back Again

o-THE-HOBBIT-POSTER-570I’m almost envious of a movie-goer approaching Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey with no fore-knowledge of J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy novels or Jackson’s previous The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. Not because they have such sumptuous treats of adventurous imagination ahead of them to discover, though I suppose that’d be nice.

But to a life-long Tolkien fan like myself, Jackson’s original trilogy (especially The Fellowship of the Ring) was a cornucopia of cinematic and personal treasures. (Though in hindsight a decade later, the LOTR movies tend to feel more like great accomplishments than great films.) That makes it’s nearly impossible for me to walk in, sit down, and watch and react to this new Hobbit film simply as a new action-adventure fantasy movie to be either enjoyed or not.

It ends up so much more complicated then that – and that’s without even getting into the whole 48 vs. 24 frames per second debate. (More on that at the end of this piece.) This is a film so many of us wanted to love—that our 11-year-old selves needed to love.

To those of us who hold Tolkien’s hobbit tales deep in our hearts, Jackson’s big screen return to Middle Earth isn’t  just another big holiday adventure film designed to rake in billions at the box office. Unfortunately, whether the blame falls on Warner Brothers or Jackson himself, too often that’s what An Unexpected Journey feels like. Read more »

Interview: The Sessions Star John Hawkes

In recent years, long-time character actor John Hawkes has slowly moved from strong but low-key supporting roles in television shows like Deadwood and Eastbound and Down and indie faves like Me You and Everyone We Know into attention- (and Oscar nomination) grabbing roles like the quietly menacing Teardrop in Winter’s Bone and the, yes, the quietly menacing cult leader in Martha Marcy May Marlene.

But this winter, Hawkes is moving directly into the spotlight, starring in The Sessions, the true story of poet and journalist Mark O’Brien, a childhood polio victim who spent most of his adult life in an iron lung. Written and directed by  Ben Lewin and co-starring Helen Hunt and William H. Macy, the film follows O’Brien (who died in 1999) as he hires Cheryl (Hunt), a sex surrogate, to help him experience sexual intimacy. (O’Brien chronicled his efforts in the 1990 magazine article ”On Seeing a Sex Surrogate.”)

Hawkes’ portrayal of both O’Brien’s physical limitations (the writer had feeling but no movement below the neck) and his irascible, sometimes prickly, nature has already earned him plenty of awards talk this Oscar season. In person, however, Hawkes is, like his characters, soft-spoken and somewhat bemused and even distrustful of fame and acclimation. (In true Midwestern fashion, the friendly Minnesota-born actor seems uncomfortable with the artificial social constructs of a multi-city press tour, and yet never anything but utterly polite, kind, and accommodating.)

Last month several other film writers and I sat down last month in Chicago with John Hawkes to talk about The Sessions and his thoughts about the real Mark O’Brien. Read more »

“It’s Not You, Mr. Bond, It’s Me”

Skyfall is a good movie. It’s a good action movie. It’s a good Bond movie. Fans of action movies and Bond movies will love it. It’s already made a lot of money at the box office, and it will continue to make a lot more in the coming weeks. You should go see it. You’ll most likely be very entertained.

As for me, I found myself bored right through the backs of my apathetic eyeballs and all the way down to my detached and disinterested toes. Yes, it was all very well done by director Sam Mendes (American Beauty, Revolutionary Road), stolidly grimacing star Daniel Craig, and especially the always-brilliant cinematographer Roger Deakins.

So we can only conclude that I no longer care much for action films or Bond films. That realization threatens to nudge my reaction to and assessment of Skyfall from the realm of film criticism and into navel-gazing personal therapy, but I’ll do my best to steer toward the former and keep the latter to a minimum. Read more »

Interview: A Royal Affair Writer-director Nikolaj Arcel

Despite its scandalous, salacious title, the Danish film A Royal Affair is as much about the 18th-century struggle between faith-based fear and Enlightenment ideals as it is about a queen’s furtive glances during court dinners.

There is a passionate affair in the film: between the British-born Queen Caroline Mathilde of Denmark (Swedish actressAlicia Vikander) and the German doctor Johann Struensee (Danish superstar Mads Mikkelsen, best known here for Casino Royale) who is initially hired to care for Denmark’s young, mentally ill King Christian VII (terrific Danish newcomer Mikkel Boe Følsgaard).

But for writer-director Nikolaj Arcel (who co-wrote the Swedish version of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo) what’s more important than royal romance is Struensee’s efforts to bring Enlightenment reason and reforms to the Denmark in the early 1770s–efforts that cost him dearly, but made him a Danish historical hero.

A Royal Affair, which was co-written by Rasmus Heisterberg, was originally based on Per Olov Enquist’s 1999 novel The Visit of the Royal Physician. That book’s film rights had, however, already been optioned, so Arcel and Heisterberg ended up also using the erotic novel Prinsesse af blodet by Bodil Steensen-Leth as their narrative hook.

Either way, the resulting film, anchored by its excellent lead performances, is a rich, sumptuous, and layered story of not just the usual political mechanisms and betrayals behind the throne, but also a highly relevant look at the clash between reform-minded ideas and Dark-Ages censorship and persecution.

I sat down with Nikolaj Arcel last month during the Chicago International Film Festival, and when we weren’t both running off-topic about our feelings about past and present Speilberg films, we talked about A Royal Affair, how ideals get corrupted, and the new wave of Danish film making.

A Royal Affair opens this weekend in select theaters across the country. Read more »

Interview: The Sessions Writer-Director Ben Lewin

When Ben Lewin decided to tell the story of poet and journalist Mark O’Brien, the Polish-born Australian-American writer-director knew he had a few hurdles to overcome.

O’Brien, who died in 1999, was a childhood polio victim and spent most of his adult life in an iron lung. That presented several challenges: How to make an engaging, entertaining film that is mostly spent watching people talk; where to find an actor who could portray both Mark’s physicality and his acerbic romanticism  and how to overcome some of the Oscar-season cliches that often accompany films about disabled individuals.

(Plus there had already been an Oscar-winning film about O’Brien–Jessica Yu’s 1997 short documentary Breathing Lessons: The Life and Work of Mark O’Brien.)

On top of all that was the particularly tricky aspect of O’Brien’s life Lewin wanted to tackle: The quest by Mark–a virgin in his late ’30s–to experience sexual intimacy with the help of a sex surrogate, which O’Brien chronicled in the 1990 magazine article ”On Seeing a Sex Surrogate.”

But Lewin’s film, The Sessions, ends up with quite a few strengths in its corner: Lewin, himself a victim of childhood polio, brings a sharp, cliche-skewering wit to the screenplay that matches O’Brien’s own bittersweet, sardonic nature while still retaining plenty of humanistic warmth and humor.

And best of all, The Sessions sports two terrific award-magnet performances from John Hawkes (Winter’s Bone, Martha Marcy May Marlene) as Mark and Helen Hunt as Cheryl, the sex surrogate Mark hires. It also co-stars Moon Bloodgood, Alan Arkin, Hawkes’ Deadwood co-star Robin Weigert, and William H. Macy as the priest Mark, a devout Catholic, approaches with his plan.

Several other film writers and I sat down last month in Chicago with Ben Lewin to talk about The Sessions. (We also spoke separately with John Hawkes–watch for that interview in the next day or so.)

The Sessions is playing at select theaters nationwide and expanding to more this weekend.

__________ Read more »

Interview: Smashed Star Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Co-Writer-Director James Ponsoldt

A film about a young couple dealing with how much they drink, Smashed defies most of the narrative and emotional conventions you might expect when you hear “alcoholism movie.”

Smashed was written by Susan Burke and James Ponsoldt, directed by Ponsoldt, and stars Mary Elizabeth Winstead (Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World) and Aaron Paul (Breaking Bad).

And though the title suggests Animal House/Project X hi-jinks, it’s really a very nuanced, rich film about the complexity of both problem drinking and maintaining a loving marriage. But for every bit Smashed doesn’t flinch from an honest look at alcoholism and recovery, it also embraces its characters’ charming and funny attributes.

Kate (Winstead) is a devoted and talented elementary teacher who spends her evenings and weekends having a blast drinking with her husband Charlie (Paul). But when the drinking and its aftermath begin to affect her job, Kate decides to sober up with the help of a recovering co-worker (a surprisingly earnest and awkward Nick Offerman from Parks and Recreation) and her AA sponsor (The Help‘s Octavia Spencer). Unfortunately Kate’s new-found sobriety begins to unbalance her genuinely loving marriage to the still-drinking Charlie.

I sat down with Mary Elizabeth Winstead and James Ponsoldt earlier this month in Chicago to talk about Smashed, which won the Special Jury Prize at Sundance in January. As with the film itself, the interview was full of both laughter and serious discussions about alcoholism and recovery.

Smashed opens today in select theaters nationwide.

_______ Read more »

“While all the other arts were born naked, [film], the youngest, has been born fully-clothed. It can say everything before it has anything to say. It is as if the savage tribe, instead of finding two bars of iron to play with, had found scattering the seashore fiddles, flutes, saxophones, trumpets, grand pianos by Erhard and Bechstein, and had begun with incredible energy, but without knowing a note of music, to hammer and thump upon them all at the same time.”

--Virginia Woolf
Subscribe