David Foster Wallace at the Ransom Center

Somewhere in a box, I have a number of notebooks from middle school and high school. Not all of them, but some kind of random sampling that my curatorial self saw fit, once upon a time, to save. Once in a while I’ll give in to the urge to look through one, and it always feels like something written by a stranger. Journals, stories, sketchbooks, artwork going back to kindergarten—I can remember making every bit of it. But there’s something about the act of taking notes that’s like spiritual auto-writing: stream-of-consciousness and wholly in the moment. It’s about as personal as writing gets.

Libraries have been acquiring writers’ archives for hundreds of years, but they’re only beginning to scratch the surface of making the collections accessible and interactive for the general population. These are obviously good resources for researchers, but there’s so much that could sweeten the experience of serious readers, non-scholarly admirers, fans. It makes me happy to see more rare book and manuscript departments making the internet really work for their collections. The Harry Ransom Center, at the University of Texas at Austin, is a great example. Although their permanent digital collections available right now cover a fascinatingly sketchy stretch of culture (Edgar Allan Poe, The Gutenberg Bible, Medieval and Early Modern Manuscripts, Mike Wallace), the site is nicely curated and has something for everyone.

They recently acquired the David Foster Wallace archives—not just papers and manuscripts but around 200 books from his personal library. And out of everything available to explore online, the books are what I find most arresting. To say that Wallace was an annotator is selling him short. He wrote notes and ideas, listed words to look up (and circled words he liked in his dictionary), stuck in Post-its and stickers, and—possibly the last writing-in-books taboo I can think of breaking—doodled on author photos. Not just any author photo, but Cormac McCarthy. In Suttree. Somehow that seems entirely fitting. Among his word list of from the inside cover of Cynthia Ozick’s The Puttermesser Papers: “brobdingnagian—huge, immense—porn stars w/brobdingnagian penises.” This is the tip of the iceberg of Wallace’s brobdingnagian intellect.

I suppose the line between intimate and voyeuristic is a fine one, but I think this is terrific. I’ll never be a Wallace scholar, but I’m a fledgling fan who’s definitely moved by the Ransom Center’s teasers to go deeper into his work. A good archival collection goes both ways: It serves enthusiasts but it can also make them. I want to find out, now, if he ever wrote about those porn stars.

(Image is the inside cover of David Foster Wallace’s annotated copy of Suttree by Cormac McCarthy, courtesy of the Harry Ransom Center.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Open Letters Monthly, March 2010

The March issue of Open Letters Monthly is up. Somehow it feels like only a few weeks since we introduced the February issue… all right, four weeks.

This month leads off with Kathleen Rooney’s look at five poetry collections by women—Matthea Harvey, Katy Lederer, Brenda Shaughnessy, Robyn Schiff, and KarenVolkman—what they offer up and what they withhold.

Ingrid Norton continues her A Year with Short Novels series with Thornton Wilder’s The Bridge of San Luis Rey, and sells me right from the start: “Thornton Wilder’s The Bridge of San Luis Rey is a peculiar masterpiece. Its chapters and themes interlock with such grace and necessity that the book seems more like a marvelous and free-standing mechanism — a jeweled music box or perfectly sprung wrist-watch — than like a novel.”

Plus:

Steve Donoghue’s take on Tom DeHaven’s chatty Our Hero: Superman on Earth.
Laura Kolbe on Mikhail Chekhov’s Anton Chekhov: A Brother’s Memoir, originally compiled in 1920.
Irma Heldman on Paul Adam’s Paganini’s Ghost.
John G. Rodwan, Jr. watching the watchers, examining Don DeLillo’s Point Omega and the reviews that have sprung up in its wake.
Finch Bronstein-Rasmussen on Katharine Beutner’s Alcestis.
Laura Tanenbaum on Louis Menand’s The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University.
Philip Gambone’s essay from The Lost Library: Gay Fiction Rediscovered on Donald Windham’s 1965 novel Two People.
Ascanio Tedeschi on J.G. Nichols’ translation of the 19th-century poet Ugo Foscolo’s Sepulchres.
Tuc MacFarland’s elegiac take on Scott D. Kraus’ The Urban Whale and R.J. Scholes and K.G. Mennell’s Elephant Management: A Scientific Assessment for South Africa.
Kristin Brower Walker on a couple of YA novels, Francisco X. Stork’s The Last Summer of the Death Warriors and Benjamin Alire Saenz’s Last Night I Sang to the Monster.
Janet Potter on Justin Taylor’s short store collection Everything Here is the Best Thing Ever.
Bartolomeo Piccolomini on Alastair McEwen’s translation of Roberto Calasso’s Tiepolo Pink.

The poem this month is Amy King’s “Café Town” and Jessica Breiman looks at the oeuvre of poet Shafer Hall.

And Phillip A. Lobo discusses the ethics of Mass Effect 2.

The photograph that opens the issue and this page is Jeffrey Eaton’s “snoverkill.” We can only hope this is the fine art equivalent of a votive offering to the gods of No More Snow, Please, and that there really is something to this “in like a lion” stuff. In the meantime, enjoy the issue.

  • Share/Bookmark

Random Instances of the Phrase “Like Fire” #2

Our Sun

That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.

– Thomas Jefferson, “Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson, 13 August 1813″

This excerpt from a TJ letter is included as part of the expansive Founders’ Constitution project in illumination of the US Constitution’s Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 (the one between post offices and non-supreme tribunals) which, of course, reads:

[The Congress shall have Power] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

And so, at the very kernel of understanding the germination and flowering of ideas in community, we find a Founder’s stance rooted in the notion of abundance: like fire.

(Image of our sun made today by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory’s (SOHO) Extreme ultraviolet Imaging Telescope, a project of international collaboration between the European Space Agency and NASA.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Reading Between the Cracks

Over on the PANK Blog, reviews editor Kirsty Logan discusses some dos and don’ts for Meanwhile Reads. I think readers who are fairly catholic in their tastes are especially predisposed to sort their literary experiences: You have your vacation reading, your bathroom reading, your insomnia reading, your commute reading. And this category of Meanwhile Reads—what I’ve always thought of as interstitial reading—what you pick up, or bring along, for those brief stolen moments of downtime. Admitting to them is one of those secret handshakes serious readers use to suss each other out. Beyond the old cliché of reading the back of the cereal box during breakfast and or having a stack of periodicals by the toilet, we all have a personal taxonomy of material for brushing teeth, waiting for your bagel in the deli, being kept on hold by the cable company. Or as Logan puts it, “I like to read. I need to read. But I’ve got shit to do.” She has a few prime choices:

Action: Reading aloud to your significant other because s/he can’t sleep and you just want to get some reading done, damn it, but you can’t just stick your head in a book because s/he keeps turning over in bed and stealing the covers.

Do Read: At Large And At Small: Familiar Essays by Anne Fadiman. Essays on ice-cream, Arctic explorers, coffee, and moving house: something for everyone. There’s even an essay on sleeping.

Don’t Read: Erotica. Either you’ll both wake yourselves up again, or you’ll have distracting dreams.

And she invites PANK readers to chip in with their own Meanwhile Reads. On this end, my toothbrushing pick lately is Mark Kurlansky’s The Food of a Younger Land, with its short, tasty food essays; my middle-of-the-night bedside book is Simon Schama’s Citizens, so if I can’t sleep at least I can learn something that I probably slept through in high school; and when I’m waiting for my dog to attend to her needs in the park I usually check Twitter. I’ve been known to bring a magazine with me on trips to the mailroom at work, to take advantage of those stolen minute-and-a-half increments waiting for the elevator.

And you, Like Fire readers? How do you fill up the tiny reading spaces in your day?

(Photo of women and girls stealing some reading time in July 1910, by Lewis Wickes Hine, is from the New York Public Library Digital Archives.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Hef at 16

The thing that gets me, when I succumb to my own worst nature and watch an episode of Hoarders, isn’t the fear that I’m going to suddenly tip over into the dark side and become a hoarder myself. (Books don’t count.) It’s that, in the process of exercising healthy junk-disposal habits, I’m throwing out something really important. I realize that’s the hoarder justification, and I don’t give in to it much. (Periodicals don’t count either.) But still—there’s an awfully fine line between crap and ephemera.

As a case in point, take Jane Sellers: Noted Egyptologist, author of The Death of Gods in Ancient Egypt, and high school friend of Hugh Hefner. They dated each other’s best friends at Steinmetz High School in Chicago, and when she moved away in 1943 they struck up a correspondence. His end, at least, was genial, hokey in the way of all smartass teenage boys, and peppered with lively, funny cartoons. 60 years later, rare book dealer Ian Kahn was cataloging Sellers’ Egyptology collection and

couldn’t help but notice that she had an entire bookcase of Playboy-related material (books, records, and many binders). I figured that she had been a bunny circa 1958 or so. I finally worked up the courage to ask her why she had what appeared to be a very large Playboy collection. She said, “Oh, Hef and I went to school together…. I really need to do something with the collection, too.”

Even though I’m a huge fan of snail mail, I’m not one to spend a lot of time bemoaning the shift to email—except when confronted with something like this. Email is great for the links and the photos, but not the doodles, and for us doodlers that’s a shame. These letters from a teenage Hugh Hefner tell me more about where his ingenuity and entrepreneurial drive come from than any history of the Playboy empire possibly could; my cultural consciousness has been raised just a little bit. I like to think I would have saved those letters too, and not just because Hef—which is how he referred to himself even back then—was voted “Most Likely to Succeed, Most Popular Boy, Best Orator, Best Dancer, Class Humorist, and Most Artistic.”

At any rate, items like that make me feel a bit more agreeable about all those boxes of letters and postcards taking up space in the attic. Surely there are some gems in with the crap. And while I’m at it I can dream that maybe, four decades or so hence, someone might refer to me—as Kahn said of Sellers—as “a lovely (and somewhat ‘glam’) octogenarian.”

(Via Book Patrol.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Springtime and The Story Prize Awards

There may be huge brownish drifts of snow still lurking everywhere, but March is book prize season, and therefore feels like spring to me. The PEN/Faulkner Award Nominees were announced last week, the NBCC Awards are next week, they’ve already started making book on The Morning News’ Tournament of Books, and The Story Prize—probably my favorite of the bunch—will be announced tomorrow night at The New School’s Tishman Auditorium in New York.

My fondness for The Story Prize has a lot to do with its scale. Every year the long list is narrowed down to three outstanding English-language short story collections, and there are three judges. It makes for a satisfying symmetry, and three is a very workable number to read along with. The finalists are, as always, a solid bunch: Daniyal Mueenuddin’s In Other Rooms, Other Wonders, Victoria Patterson’s Drift and Wells Tower’s Everything Ravaged, Everything Burned (which, taken together, make a nice bit of found poetry, but that’s another matter). There are interviews with the authors on The Story Prize’s blog, along with a terrific additional list of recommended short fiction. And if there are any of the three you haven’t read yet, you still have nearly 24 hours before the prize is announced, which includes one nice long Wednesday lunch hour.

  • Share/Bookmark

Strata: Brian Griffith

Brian Griffith is an independent historian with an interest in the culture wars that take place in our world.  Ecology, religion, history… he explores them all.  He has worked in the United States, India, Kenya, and now makes his home near Toronto. In Correcting Jesus: 2000 Years of Changing the Story, he fearlessly takes a look at some of the most contentious issues surrounding religion: nonviolence, the role of women, the way that the same words have been used to justify widely differing agendas, and how and why beliefs developed and changed over the centuries. Brian also does a heroic job of keeping his office tidy.

What does your desk—the bare desk itself—look like, and how did you acquire it?

Its a big laminated desk. Looks as if it was walnut and has three drawers to each side. It barely fits one side of the solarium. Got it in a box from Office Depot and stuck it together.

What’s on your desk?

A copper pot full of ivy with unweeded shoots of tall grass, my wife’s two-volume Persian-English dictionary, a row of editing and style manuals,  pictures of my sister at her Mexican art cafe in Austin, Texas, and of some very good-looking relatives in Iran. The computer nearly fills the remaining space.

What do you wish wasn’t on your desk?

I wish there were shelves for the editing books and dictionaries, or the computer could leave a surface space for handwriting.

Are there artifacts in your office that relate to your current project?

The coffee mug is slightly relevant. It looks like black marble with the head of a Roman emperor, which recalls our many tensions between authority and friendship.

Are there living things in your office (besides yourself)?

Six potted plants left by house guests. But the condominium forbids animals, except maybe birds. A parrot would be good.

What else surrounds you?

Two sides of the office are windows with venetian blinds and a tenth-floor view of Toronto’s suburbs. The other two walls are glass, including the sliding door. Since the walls are clear, you can’t pile book shelves against them. The office can be no more cluttered than the adjoining living room, or it would make the living room look just as junky. My history books and notes have to go somewhere else.

What’s on the walls?

On the non-glass portions there’s a large framed butterfly from a Brazilian butterfly ranch, a Japanese fan, and a small picture of me and my wife in a Niagara Falls flower garden.

What have you lost in your office that you really wish you could find?

Well, my notes. They are handwritten on quarter-page sheets of paper, each with a source reference. And after about 25 years, the notes fill several file cabinets which are scattered in the closets of three rooms. We don’t like file cabinets being visible; they do look stultifying. So anytime I run into a question, like what did various religious leaders say about freedom, it can be slow finding what notes touch on that. But I like the paper note-cards. You can write them anywhere, and then hand-shuffle them into any order when looking for patterns.

What tools do you write with?

Hand-written note cards and shoe boxes with cardboard dividers for sorting ideas. I play with book or chapter outlines on the computer screen till patterns in the notes and the outline fit. Then shuffle the cards for each segment into rough order of presentation. I write on screen, separating the notes into used and unneeded piles. After each draft I can see where it needs more research, and repeat the process.

Is anyone allowed to come in and clean?

Sure, it’s the family office. My wife has to do her work too.  I get bumped off  the computer and everybody gets cleaning opportunities.

T. Myers is a writer who could never manage an office with glass walls, although she certainly admires people who can.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pimp My Article

Correction of the week comes from the New York Times ArtsBeat Blog, concerning David Remnick’s upcoming Obama bio:

An earlier version of this post misquoted Mr. Remnick on his comparison between the book and a New Yorker article he had previously written. He said the book would not be a “pumped up” version of the article; he did not say that it would not be a “pimped out” version of the article.

So does that mean the book might be a pimped out version? Because I’d read that.

  • Share/Bookmark

Bare Naked Books

According to a very informal poll, people I know are fairly evenly divided between dust jacket removers and dust jacket tolerators. The removers cite wear and tear mostly, along with a general dislike of having to wrangle extra paper when reading in transit. Tolerators, of which I’m one, are more laissez-faire about beating their books up, and they want the full aesthetic experience of the cover as originally designed. And if I’m going to be honest, I like the built-in bookmark, that little halfway post when I stop using the front flaps to mark my place and start with the back ones.

The Guardian’s Peter Robins brought up the dust jacket issue recently, and pointed out that there is actually happy medium, which is casewrapping—printing the cover art directly on the boards of the book. A couple of years ago that would have brought to mind my high school history textbook, with the ubiquitous ugly glossy montage and boinked-up corners. Lately, though, designers and publishers are turning to printed covers as an upscale alternative, with the same suggestion of a modern/classic interface as letterpress printing. In fact, the look is often similar, with embossing and handset type. In the New York Observer, Leon Neyfakh gives some good-looking examples: Colin Beavan’s No Impact Man, David Byrne’s Bicycle Diaries, and Stephen Elliott’s The Adderall Diaries. These are the stepchildren of the McSweeny’s aesthetic, with a small-press band-poster silkscreen look, even though they come from Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Viking and Graywolf. FSG designer Charlotte Strick says:

There’s something really exciting about seeing stamping directly on the boards…. I don’t know if I even completely understand why that is. Maybe there’s something permanent about it, that kind of makes it feel substantial and special and gives it a certain integrity.

Along with those is a run of clothbound books. Again, they’re managing to combine the nostalgic vibe of those matched sets from your childhood shelves with some great, vibrant graphics. Coralie Bickford-Smith’s work for Penguin Classics comes to mind first, but there are a number of cloth covers coming out, often as series. And their sewn-in bookmarks neatly solve the need for flaps as placeholders.

The only downside I can see is the deterioration that dustjackets were originally made to prevent. I’m not sure any of them is going to look too sharp after a week in someone’s purse or briefcase. Still, there are ways of getting around that—souvenir tote bags are the band t-shirts of the ’10s! And the gorgeous handmade book bindings in BibliOdyssey’s recent photo set, some of them going back to the 15th century, have aged rather nicely. Maybe the key is to start working in sharkskin, goatskin, and Morocco leather. More likely it’s time to buy stock in Brodart. But really, any investment in the book as a physical thing of beauty works for me.

(Book is Das Unheimliche Buch, bound by Karl Ebert in 1914, via BibliOdyssey.)

  • Share/Bookmark

So Many Books: The HTMLGIANT Writing Contest

Now that everyone has well and completely absorbed the Guardian’s guest writers’ fiction writing tips, as well as the other helpful voices chiming in around the internet (notably the Afterword’s 49th parallel version, which will be an ongoing series, and Laura Ellen Scott, because this is threatening to become a Serious Business already), it’s time to WRITE! Because the redoubtable HTMLGIANT is sponsoring a writing contest, and anyone who enters will find themselves in some fine company indeed.

The theme is Love Stories, and the numbers 100 and 500 should incorporated into the work—”and not just as an afterthought.” Ten finalists will be selected, with Special Guest Judge Rick Moody selecting the grand prize winner. And the prize is awesome: 100 books from the Dalkey Archive Press‘ excellent selection. If you’re not already familiar with Dalkey, do go take a look. They have a super catalog, and are currently offering a deal on 100 books for $500; hence the 100/500 theme.

Pieces should be no longer than 3,500 words, and the deadline is March 21 (with winners announced on April 15). There are no constraints as to form, only quality. But since we all know how to write fiction now, that shouldn’t be a problem, right? Have at it.

  • Share/Bookmark
Subscribe