Love and Freindship

All sorts of things will stop me in my tracks when I’m out trolling for used books. Something I’ve been wanting or meaning to read, of course, but also any number of cover elements: A great image, well-done type, a title I’ve never heard of by an author I like, a book somebody once mentioned long ago that rings a bell… but there’s nothing that pulls me up short like a typo. I spend most of my working day looking for them, and the inner red pencil never turns off.

So this book got my attention right off the bat: Love and Freindship and Other Early Works by Jane Austen. When’s the last time you saw such a magnificently blatant misspelling on the cover of a published book? And not some fly-by-night POD job, but a regular commercial trade paperback from Harmony, a Random House imprint. Not only was the title spelled wrong on the cover, but on the title page, the back cover blurb, and every single page header… very strange.

After convincing Google that yes, I did mean “love and freindship,” I discovered that it’s a bit of Jane Austen juvenilia dating from 1790, when she was 14, and the misspelling was preserved out of some combination of cuteness and Austen worship. Written as a series of letters between Laura St. Clair, daughter of a minor Scottish nobleman, and her friend Isabel and Isabel’s daughter Marianne, “Love and Freindship” is Austen’s cheerful teen-girl parody of the romantic tales of the day. The seeds of future accomplishment are there if you look—she references “sensibility” often—but mostly the story leaves no doubt that Jane Austen was a typical young writer with a great love of melodrama and romance:

“After having wandered some time on the Banks of the Uske without knowing which way to go,” [says the handsome Edward Lindsay, son of a baronet] “I began to lament my cruel Destiny in the bitterest and most pathetic Manner. It was now perfectly dark, not a single star was there to direct my steps, and I know not what might have befallen me, had I not at length discerned thro’ the solemn Gloom that surrounded me a distant Light, which, as I approached it, I discovered to be the chearfull Blaze of your fire. Impelled by the combination of Misfortunes under which I laboured, namely Fear, Cold, and Hunger, I hesitated not to ask admittance, which at length I have gained; and now, my Adorable Laura (continued he, taking my Hand) when may I hope to receive that reward of all the painfull sufferings I have undergone during the course of my attachment to you, to which I have ever aspired. Oh! when will you reward me with Yourself?”

“This instant, Dear and Amiable Edward,” (replied I). We were immediately united by my Father, who, tho’ he had never taken orders, had been bred to the Church.

And so forth. The blurb on the back calls it “a hilarious romp in which two young ladies cavort about 18th-century England, leaving havoc in their wake and poking fun at such popularly applauded traditions as vaporous ladies and middle-class gentility,” but you have to wonder just how sly the young Ms. Austen’s intentions were—how much parody, how much Mary Sue? It will definitely take closer reading, and any Austen scholars out there should feel free to enlighten me. In the meantime, it goes on the Books Bought For Their Covers shelf, where it can languish among freinds.

  • Share/Bookmark

Man Booker Dozen Announced

The judges for the 2010 Man Booker Prize for Fiction have announced their longlist:

Peter Carey – Parrot and Olivier in America
Emma Donoghue – Room
Helen Dunmore – The Betrayal
Damon Galgut – In a Strange Room
Howard Jacobson – The Finkler Question
Andrea Levy – The Long Song
Tom McCarthy – C
David Mitchell – The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet
Lisa Moore – February
Paul Murray – Skippy Dies
Rose Tremain – Trespass
Christos Tsiolkas – The Slap
Alan Warner – The Stars in the Bright Sky

There are no knock-down blockbusters like last year’s winner, Wolf Hall, but I’m hearing a lot of love already for Andrea Levy, Tom McCarthy and David Mitchell. Peter Carey has won the Man Booker twice before, and Christos Tsiolkas’ The Slap won the 2009 Commonwealth Prize. The 13 novels, also known as a “Man Booker Dozen,” were picked from an original field of 138; the shortlist will be announced on September 7.

As books under consideration must have been published in the UK between October 1, 2009 and September 30, 2010, not all are available on this side of the pond yet. I have The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet toward the top of the towering stack on my desk, and I’ve been looking forward to getting my hands on Emma Donoghue’s Room since hearing her speak at BEA last spring. And since the winner won’t be announced until October 12 that gives me plenty of time to catch up, and plenty of time for some dark horses to come from behind.

  • Share/Bookmark

Strata: Pamela Ferdinand

As a journalist, Pamela Ferdinand has written for The Boston Globe Magazine, National Geographic News and The Washington Post. She recently co-authored a memoir, Three Wishes: A True Story of Good Friends, Crushing Heartbreak, and Astonishing Luck on Our Way to Love and Motherhood, with two other journalists, Carey Goldberg and Beth Jones. Her office is remarkably clean.

What does your desk—the bare desk itself—look like, and how did you acquire it?

My desk is a light birch veneer IKEA tabletop with brushed silver trestle legs. It’s about the farthest thing from my ideal, which would be an antique natural wood farm table with a wide top and lots of character. In fact, it’s pretty much anti-character. But my family and I moved last year to a rental home, and this desk was cheerful and cheap.

What’s on your desk?

My trustworthy Mac—a 13” MacBook Pro hooked up to a monitor that sits on a stand above it. I can easily unplug everything and grab it on the go. The monitor is 21” and has enough real estate to let me put two pages up simultaneously (one to write, one to read) but not too much because big screens make me dizzy. I also have a small SAD lamp to combat any winter morning blues and a regular white lamp with a green silk round shade. I keep the rest of the desk clear of clutter. A rolling file cabinet to my left contains papers, desk supplies, printer, and phone. So everything is almost with arm’s reach, but I don’t have to look at it—which helps clear and focus my increasingly addled mind.

What do you wish wasn’t on your desk?

Everything. I wish I could do it all by pen and paper! But I can’t. My handwriting has gotten progressively worse the longer I’ve typed.

Are there artifacts in your office that relate to your current project?

Yes. In the closet, there are boxes of diaries, letters, and photographs from the time period I wrote about. I keep stacks of old manuscripts in the closet. A collection of book galleys and a Polish edition of our memoir sit in a white IKEA bookcase to my left, which is tilted horizontally. I also keep out some love notes and recent Valentine’s Day cards from Mark, my significant other, and our daughter Emma, without whom the memoir wouldn’t exist.

Are there living things in your office (besides yourself)?

Two plants. And, more importantly, a 19-year-old, one-eyed cat, Clementine. Mark has terrible allergies so she is confined to my home office where she has a litter box, food, and water fountain in the closet. She also has a cozy bed with a blanket and heating pad. A Miami Herald colleague found her as a kitten in the parking lot of a Chinese restaurant. In the years since, Clementine lost her right eye to cancer, and she has kidney failure, but she’s hanging in there. And I’m hanging right in there with her.

What else surrounds you?

Until several months ago, not much. My office is on the second floor, and I have a set of wide, tall windows that face a quiet street, an empty lot, and a series of pastel-colored wooden frame houses. An elevated train track runs behind and above them; I heard the trains a lot the first day we moved in, but my brain adjusted, and I never notice them any more. The horizontal bookcase to my left contains boxes for letters, DVDs, books, as well as an iPod and speakers. To my right and behind me are a side table that I refinished, a space heater, a brown leather loveseat, and a small book cabinet with a television on top. I wanted to keep the room empty while I wrote the first drafts, and I didn’t know how long we’d be here, so it was a pretty spartan environment for a long time. Then Danielle Dale, a local interior designer who was building her portfolio, offered online to help several people fix up one room in their house. That was a no-brainer. I had a feeling I’d be spending a lot more time at my desk this year so I called her, and she quickly transformed the space into a warm, feminine office with little touches: pillows, a rug, picture ledge, window valance. She moved some furniture around and stole things like a mirror and lamp from other parts of the house. Now it feels like a completely different room.

What’s on the walls?

A black-and-white fabric board with photos of family and friends stuck between elastic ribbons. Mark’s Harvard University diploma from 2004; he took classes for 12 years for credit, intending to do a graduate degree. He would never hang it himself, but I’m incredibly proud of him, and it dates from around the time we met. (Sorry, hopeless romantic.) I also have several photos—two by Mark of landscapes in New Zealand and India; one of an elephant by photographer Jean-Claude Louis; and a black-and-white photo of a girl below a bird’s nest by a poet friend Trish Crapo. I also framed and hung a piece of notebook paper signed by the biologist E.O. Wilson, whom I admire for his genius and humility.

What have you lost in your office that you really wish you could find?

My reading glasses. No idea where they are. I’ve been too lazy to wear them, and by now I probably need a new prescription anyway.

What tools do you write with?

The Mac, reporter’s notepads, a digital recorder, my iPod. Does coffee count as a tool?

Is anyone allowed to come in and clean?

Yes. Especially with the cat here, I really appreciate a good vacuum, occasional steam clean, and dusting. I like it when the desk loses that dust grit and the air smells fresh.

T. Myers is a writer who likes the idea of cleaning, if not the reality.

  • Share/Bookmark

Gladiators

Once again there’s drama in the ungoverned badlands of eBook rights, with Amazon, once more, prominently at the center.

Its ally this time around is hard-hitting agent Andrew Wylie. Late last Wednesday, Wylie announced the formation of its own publishing venture, Odyssey Editions, which will be publishing the eBook titles of some of his biggest-selling authors and supplying them to the Amazon Kindle store. Twenty major backlist works, including Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita, John Updike’s Rabbit books, The Stories of John Cheever, and Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, will be Amazon’s exclusive property for two years.

Not for nothing is Wylie nicknamed “the Jackal,” and this is a pretty overt bit of aggressive side-taking. For one thing, there’s that “exclusive” clause, and though the Kindle app is available on a range of platforms, the deal is still funneling everything through one all-powerful conduit. And the Wylie Agency’s new incarnation as publisher effectively cuts any other house out of the deal. Random House, which publishes most of the print editions of the titles in question, responded immediately, noting that it was disputing Amazon’s rights to the titles and planned to take “appropriate action.”

This was followed up by MacMillan CEO John Sargent, champion of the Big Six version of the little guy, with a public statement on the MacMillan website:

I understand why Amazon wants an exclusive deal with Andrew. They have asked us too for exclusive product, as has every major retailer we deal with. This is smart retailing, and a great deal for Amazon. But it is an extraordinarily bad deal for writers, illustrators, publishers, other booksellers, and for anyone who believes that books should be as widely available as possible. This deal advantages Amazon, which already has the dominant share in this market.

Random House then stepped up with their appropriate action, which, appropriately, turned out to be a refusal to do any future business with the Wylie Agency “until this situation is resolved.”

Fair enough. Reactions to the dispute have been predictably all over the board, from predictions of Armageddon in the Guardian to the New York Times‘ vaguely condescending designation as a fuss. There’s plenty of opportunity for all kinds of narrow focus to fit anyone’s point of view, and a lot of trees obscuring this particular forest (if trees aren’t too inappropriate a metaphor here). To that end Evan Schnittman, at Black Plastic Glasses, has a solidly holistic overview that’s worth reading through:

The net result of this practice is that no one can create anywhere near a coherent marketing and publicity program for trade books as no one knows who owns what. Furthermore, it is impossible to align efforts, as competing publishers often own different portions of rights to the same work. It’s the authors who suffer in the end….

Divide and conquer is a very dangerous game as it tries to create the greatest short-term value for a work by selling off the sum of the individual rights. However, a book’s value is a very gestalt concept. The whole work has FAR greater value than the sum of the individual rights. Allowing each individual part, or right, to be disaggregated and auctioned to the highest bidder serves only those who make profit from short-term gain.

The fact that this is all playing out in the open invites a whole lot of kibitzing, and I’d venture to say that’s half the point. My answer to Jacket Copy‘s question about the utility of a public battle—“Surely someone at the Wylie Agency has Random House’s phone number”—is that this is just another version of 21st-century version of Christians and lions for our entertainment just as much as a whole lot of people’s livelihoods at stake. It’s no accident that a public venue online is called a forum, and even less so that lately we’re all encouraged to give everything a thumbs-up or not. I’m assuming there’s a lot more maneuvering taking place behind the scenes, and that this particular power play isn’t settled yet by any means. But what we can see is turning out to be an interesting sort of litmus for the industry, and bears watching.

  • Share/Bookmark

Crash Report

There are prompts and then there are prompts. Garrett Murray, a Brooklyn-based filmmaker and developer, has been getting his inspiration courtesy of Adobe crash reports. You know the deal: Photoshop (or some other application—hello Firefox 3.5.10!) crashes and you’re offered, by way of apology, a popup window asking you if you’d like to report it. The utility of which is pretty questionable… it feels an awful lot like a higher-tech version of “I’m telling Mom!”

Murray began treating the reports as a straight up narrative—

I changed the canvas size (added 400 pixels to the height while anchoring the existing canvas to the top in case you’re interested in the little details) and everything disappeared. Luckily I had just saved…. I’m an over-saver. I save all the time. Probably got into the habit because of applications with terrible stability patterns. You know, like your application.

—progressing through the philosophical—

Crashed on quit again. I’m confused by this. Why would quitting the app cause a crash so frequently? This would be like if you worked in an office from 9-5 and every day at 4:59 PM you became filled with rage and ran around throwing chairs and breaking windows.

—into an interesting hybrid kind of flash fiction—

The summer before her senior year, as her sisters packed to head back to their party schools (Samantha to Florida State and Melissa to Georgia), Tracy trotted off to the library to study the Civil War and advanced calculus.

(Yes, it does have to do with Photoshop crashing in an oblique way.)

And it occurs to me that if the internet has made us all critics and sources of news and members of the amorphous new creative class, then everything should be a prompt. And there ought to be a prize somewhere on the Web for this. In fact, I will gladly cough a good one up to the best example of inappropriately creative feedback submitted by a Like Fire reader before September 1, 2010, so have at it. Prize to be announced at a later date; you’ll have to trust me on this.

(via Galleycat.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Postcard Poetry

Is it my imagination or are chain letters falling by the wayside? I don’t mean the email meme kind that you need to send to 25 POWERFUL SPIRITS IN YOUR LIFE IN THE NEXT 15 MINUTES AND SOMETHING WONDERFUL WILL MANIFEST FOR YOU… those have a scary zombie life all their own and will quite possibly never die. I’m thinking of the benign kind, the ones that prey on our best and worst natures at the same time—because you will follow up and send the letter off to 10 friends who won’t screw it up; you will send a recipe/paperback book/dishtowel/artist’s trading card out to the first person on the list. You will. Except you don’t, and feel vaguely guilty for not having followed up on something you really didn’t want to do in the first place. And you only ever get one or two recipes/paperback books/dishtowels/artist’s trading cards anyway, because all over the world your friends and your friends’ friends are lying in bed feeling vaguely guilty that they didn’t follow up either. Really, the chain letter cannot die a speedy enough death.

Except for this one. (You did know that was coming, right?)

Big thanks to the NewPages Blog for alerting us to the August 2010 Postcard Poetry Project, now open for registration. This one actually takes more effort and thought than sending your zucchini bread recipe to your best friend’s aunt, but the return should be really something:

Get yourself at least 31 postcards. These can be found at book stores, thrift shops, online, drug stores, antique shops, museums, gift shops. (You’ll be amazed at how quickly you become a postcard addict.)

On or about July 27th, write an original poem right on a postcard and mail it to the person on the list below your name. (If you are at the very bottom, send a card to the name at the top.) And please WRITE LEGIBLY!

Starting on August 1st, ideally in response to a card YOU receive, keep writing a poem a day on a postcard and mailing it to successive folks on the list until you’ve sent out 31 postcards. Of course you can keep going and send as many as you like but we ask you to commit to at least 31 (a month’s worth).

Best of all, you don’t have to tap into your own friend pool and suffer the attendant worry about whether your favorite people also happen to dependable. No moral judgments are necessary, because the Postcard Poetry people are making the list. Just register, log in, and you’re set to write poetry to a total stranger—what could be more wonderful?

Anybody in? I’m already a postcard addict, so I suppose I have no excuse not to. Stay tuned.

  • Share/Bookmark

Spy in the House of Writers

Everyone’s got their own personal slot on the biographical criticism spectrum. Whether you’re against taking an author’s circumstances into account when looking at the work or whether you wish there was a literary version of People Magazine, you’re on there somewhere. But I’m guessing not many people don’t like to see an author photo. As newborns we’re wired to recognize faces before anything else, and there’s something psychically grounding about having a set of features to attach to a set of words.

And coming a close second in terms of fixing the abstract in the physical world—one of the first inanimate object all children draw, no matter where they’re from—is a house. There’s always been a quiet current of fascination with author’s houses and rooms, and it doesn’t take much effort to preserve that tiny slice of a writer’s life for posterity. Perhaps because they do so much of their work in one place, at one desk, it’s an easily apprehended slice of authorial history that somehow doesn’t feel all that invasive to spy on. The Guardian has had a great run with its Writers’ Rooms series, and now there’s a new blog, Writers’ Houses, devoted to “the art of literary pilgrimage.” Curator A.N. Devers explains:

The impulse to create a site dedicated to documenting writers’ houses came from a growing obsession, since childhood, with books, travel, and making connections between a writer’s work and place.

The James Merrill House in Stonington, CT., is the first feature, with an elegant essay by Ivy Pochoda. As writer in residence there two years ago, she’s earned
an easy intimacy with the space. Her photographs have an almost watercolor-like mellowness to them—not your usual publicity pictures—and the whole effect is inviting. And speaking of which, the site has commissioned a set of limited edition prints of authors’ homes. I’m especially fond of the Poe Cottage, which is not far from this writer’s house.

Devers points out that there are 290 writers’ houses in France alone, so there should be no shortage of material. And if the initial posts are any indication, it should be rich and evocative, maybe worth dusting off your New Historicist lapel button for.

(Poe Cottage image by M+E)

  • Share/Bookmark

Let Us Eat Cake

To celebrate the 221st anniversary of the birth of the French republic, the Guardian has a quiz on the Bastille in literature. It cites the usual suspects: A Tale of Two Cities, The Scarlet Pimpernel, and our good friend Voltaire. But if you’re interested in going beyond the novel, journalist Peregrine Worsthorne has given Five Books some suggestions for French Revolutionary reading, along with appropriately toothy commentary:

If you read [De Tocqueville], it’s more about the French Revolution than the American Revolution. Well, it’s about democracy in general. But as Tocqueville perceives it the great problem… well, in a way, perhaps his book should be called the American Aristocracy rather than American Democracy, because it’s really all about the need in democratic politics to have a public-spirited aristocracy. Of course you didn’t use the word aristocracy then, because despite being the ideal, the word was out of fashion, and Tocqueville was writing about democracy. But he did worry that America didn’t have that aristocratic element and that a democracy without that aristocratic element would not work.

I would add to that list my ongoing bedside read, Simon Schama’s Citizens—a fine overview of the details and an engrossing tale besides.

Here’s hoping your day has at least a little liberté, égalité, and fraternité in it.

(Image is a print of the ninth Bastille Day anniversary celebration in the square of the Fields Elyseés, courtesy of the Library of Congress.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Elemental Storytelling

There’s something about the Periodic Table of Elements that lends itself to riffing. I suppose because it is in fact elemental, and at the same time complex—it appeals to our love of taxonomy, and those ambiguous letter abbreviations spark all kinds of associations. Lately a Periodic Table of Swearing has been making the internet rounds, and even though it’s frustratingly Brit-centric—on this side of the pond F would most certainly be in the Number One spot—it’s still pretty sophomorically funny. In the past few months I’ve come across a Periodic Table of Typefaces and a Periodic Table of Texting t-shirt, and the Table of Condiments that Periodically Go Bad has held pride of place on my refrigerator for the past six years.

Now Sam Kean is blogging the original Periodic Table over at Slate in honor of his new book, The Disappearing Spoon: And Other True Tales of Madness, Love, and the History of the World from the Periodic Table of the Elements. Among the recent spate of books narrating the histories of everyday things, there seems to be a desire to get more and more basic—hence the sagas of salt, potatoes, paper clips, the color red. And you don’t get any more basic than the elements, am I right? The one that first beguiled Kean was mercury, which makes perfect sense… anyone else old enough to have been given a baby food jar holding a glob of mercury to shake and roll around in science class? I’m guessing kids today aren’t so lucky, which is why it’s good to know that “Lewis and Clark hauled 600 mercury-laced laxative tablets with them when they explored the interior of America—historians have tracked down some places where they stayed based on deposits in the soil.”

Kean starts with that alchemical superstar antimony, and the series will run through the beginning of August and cover 25 elements (there are 118 total, so you might have to buy the book to get the dirt on Lanthanides and Actinides). But like any good narrative it should contain a sampling of Transition Elements, not to mention those heroic Noble Gases, so it should be an epic worth following.

  • Share/Bookmark

Strata: Sonya Chung

Sonya Chung characterizes herself as a late bloomer, a writer who came to the love of books in college rather than in childhood. Now, however, with a string of awards to her credit—including a Pushcart Prize nomination and the Charles Johnson Fiction Award—her life is all about books and the love of creating stories. Her first novel, Long for This World, has gained her both critical acclaim and many loyal fans. Sonya recently joined the Creative Writing Program at Columbia University as a faculty member. And her office? It just screams “Writer!

What does your desk—the bare desk itself—look like, and how did you acquire it?

It’s a 7-foot table, Portuguese-made. It’s pine, we think (grainy but not knotty), the wood is worn and stained and nicked all over. It looks like it’s survived some rough times. It actually belongs to my partner John, who acquired it from a friend (who acquired it in Mexico) and kindly allows me to work at it. It used to be our combination dining/work table; we recently splurged on a separate table for eating, so now I can spread out a bit. Did I mention we live in a studio apartment?

What’s on your desk?

My iBook G4 comes and goes at the center of the table (the lonely power cord sits there awaiting it, trailing down to the power strip on the floor, when it goes on journeys). At one end is the printer, an ancient inkjet that seems to keep on going, and a lamp (K-mart, electric-pink shade). At the other end is a placemat, for mid-day snacking or lunching while working. Scattered about: pen/pencil cups (two), an electric pencil sharpener (for no good reason, I’ve recently taken to using mechanical pencils), a tall vase with dried roses from a bouquet given to me at my book party in March, one small speaker (podcasts, audiobooks, music). Various piles: books I’m currently reading (The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge, The Virgin Suicides), research books for my second novel, books for teaching, manuscript drafts (mine and students’), the misc (junk) pile, the mail pile. Always a coffee mug, usually at least half full.

What do you wish wasn’t on your desk?

Dust (relentless). All these charger and connecting cords: printer, speaker, laptop power, iPod syncing. Complete cordlessness is my fantasy. What a mess.

Are there artifacts in your office that relate to your current project?

Research books (Russia-related, mostly) and hard-copy draft sections for my second novel. Clipped articles (cut-and-paste is still a literal, physical act for me) in yet another pile for potential short essays for The Millions, where I’m a regular contributor.

Are there living things in your office (besides yourself)?

As I mentioned, it’s a studio. So yes—partner/roommate in the mornings and evenings, plants (rubber trees, vegetable seedlings on the window sill), and my amazing pup Pax.

What else surrounds you?

A room-divider/bookshelf the length of the table-desk; a view of high-rise housing projects in one direction, Columbia graduate schools and Morningside Park in another; recycling buckets, shoe rack, dog-hair dust bunnies, magazines seemingly everywhere…

OK, I’m back. This exercise is making me get up and start putting away all the clutter around me.

What’s on the walls?

The schedule for the 32nd Asian American International Film Festival is taped up behind me; by the couch and bed, framed: a Romare Bearden drawing, a panoramic black-and-white photograph (by Tom Blackmore) of JFK at Fort Bragg in 1961, and a painting by John’s aunt.

What have you lost in your office that you really wish you could find?

It’s funny; I know I’ve lost things, but I’ve forgotten what they are. So I guess I don’t really care that much about finding them. Hopefully they’ll find me if they need to be found.

What tools do you write with?

Mostly the laptop; I wear these black wrist support things that look like roller-derby gloves but are soft and feel more like lingerie. I also sit on an Exer-ball instead of a chair, because of back problems. (I’m really a ridiculous sight, now that I think about it.)

When screen overload kicks in, I use a legal pad, mechanical pencils, and Bic Pilot G-2 retractable (click-top) pens. I also, as mentioned above, use scissors and tape, sometimes to play with moving around different sections in a story or my novel.

I also try to use my imagination and intelligence as much as possible.

Is anyone allowed to come in and clean?

God, I wish. Anyone interested, come on over.

T. Myers is a writer who also wishes somebody would come in and clean her office. Somebody very brave.

  • Share/Bookmark
Subscribe