Pocket Review: Birds of a Lesser Paradise by Megan Mayhew Bergman

Birds of a Lesser Paradise
Megan Mayhew Bergman
Scribner, 2012

I like to think I bring at least a somewhat cool head to the reviews I write. Which is not to say I’m not subjective—I can love something or hate it or, more often, find faults and virtues scattered throughout. But I don’t tend to get emotional over it. It’s a book, crafted by a human hand with varying degrees of artfulness, and my job here is to figure out what works for me and what doesn’t, and what may or may not work for the next reader on any given day.

But once in a while a book comes along that just throws me for a loop, and I’m delighted to say that Megan Mayhew Bergman’s Birds of a Lesser Paradise is one of them. Not because it makes writing the review any easier—it doesn’t—but because I’m just so glad I got to read it.

While this isn’t a collection of linked short stories, there are themes that repeat just enough to make them cohere and echo off each other. It’s a cumulative reading experience, where each discrete piece reveals itself to riff off the others. And while my response to this is, obviously, deeply personal, I also imagine I’m not the only one who feels shot right through the heart by Mayhew Bergman’s subjects: Being a mother. Having a mother. Slowly losing a parent to dementia. Loving animals a bit unreasonably. The tug of wanting to rescue all the hurt ones. And the awful guilt of feeling like you’ve failed a good dog. (Nearly seven years—OK, six years and 355 days—after losing a really good dog of my own, to this day unsure whether I could have saved him if I’d done something differently, I still have to cry every time I think of him.) And this, this is is the big one: That love can be, and is, often irrational. And we all have to live with that.

In the lead tale, “Housewifely Arts,” which first entranced me in One Story, that irrationality is the narrator’s nine-hour road trip with her small son to find Carnie, an African gray parrot whom she despises but who can speak in her dead mother’s voice. That irrationality is the title story’s heroine, who plunges into the woods with her elderly, deceptively fragile father and a handsome paying tourist in search of the quite likely extinct ivory-billed woodpecker. In “Another Story She Won’t Believe” it is the woman “sober going on forty-six days,” making her way through a blizzard to the Lemur Center where she volunteers, to warm a rescued aye-aye named, god help us all, Faye Done Away. Or the narrator in “Every Vein a Tooth,” finding herself caught between her live-in boyfriend and a menagerie of rescued animals:

Three golden retrievers in various states of decline—Salli with her missing ear and lumps of scar tissue, paralyzed Prince dragging his cart down the hallway, toothless and epileptic Sam dreaming wild on the kitchen floor. Or, it might have been the declawed raccoon marauding in the living room. The one-eyed chinchilla nesting in cedar chips in what could have been the nursery. I didn’t count the feral cats—they lived underneath the sofa, largely out of sight.

What could have been the nursery—but Mayhew Bergman’s protagonists aren’t lost and desperate childless women clinging to animals in order to fill the spaces in empty wombs and empty beds. They just realize that love, in whatever form it presents itself, is not something to be turned away. They aren’t caricatures; they’re a little raw around the edges, but who can blame them? The men here mostly feel a bit temporary, with short, elemental names: Smith, Gray, Wood, Mac. But the animals, the parents, the children throb faithfully with love given and returned; it’s not so much about whose side I’m supposed to be on here, but whose side I’m allowed to be on when all is said and done. The narrator of “The Urban Coop” runs her easygoing husband’s city farm plot, cares for the homeless who volunteer there, wishes for a baby of her own, and reverberates with guilt over her dog, “loyal to the point of self-destruction,” who desperately swims a mile out to sea when they leave him unattended on their boat one evening. He is picked up by a fishing boat and returned, but afterward she can’t quite let him out of her sight: “Stay with me, I said to him, and I will make it up to you. Again and again.”

If I were to say: There but for whatever gods of compatibility go I, with our mismatched gallery of adopted stray cats and a dog who sleeps in the bed, I know plenty of people who would nod their heads. And they should all read Birds of a Lesser Paradise. Being a mother. Having a mother. “Yesterday’s Whales” finds its main character pregnant, conflicted, running home to her own mother, and this, ultimately, is the one that made me weep in public:

Mothers, I believe, intoxicate us. We idolize them and take them for granted. We hate them and blame them and exalt them more thoroughly than anyone else in our lives. We sift through the evidence of their love, reassure ourselves of their affection and its biological genesis. We can steal and lie and leave and they will love us.

These are wonderful, well-written, heartfelt stories; Megan Mayhew Bergman has put together a beautifully coherent and sweet book. I myself had to double check the dedication page to make sure they weren’t written just for me. But don’t let that stop you—they’re for all of us stray creatures who need a little love and rescuing.

Share

6 Comments to Pocket Review: Birds of a Lesser Paradise by Megan Mayhew Bergman

  1. Leah's Gravatar Leah
    July 9, 2012 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    This is on the nightstand and just moved up to “Next” which, luckily for me, means I get to start reading it tonight. Thanks for the recommendation and great review.

  2. July 10, 2012 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    I think I am afraid of how much I’d cry if I read these stories, but the writing sounds gorgeous, and you did a beautiful job writing about the story collection.

  3. Leah's Gravatar Leah
    July 15, 2012 at 3:34 am | Permalink

    Lisa, when I read the epigraph I was filled with admiration for your restraint. ;-)

  4. July 23, 2012 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Lovely! If I hadn’t already read and adored this collection (for all the reasons you’ve described so well), I would have added it to my list immediately; as it is, I now want to re-read. Because weren’t they so wonderful? And the way that they echoed each other and, yet, still remained distinct? Terrific.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe